Have you noticed that the IPCC has changed the name Global Warming to Climate Change? Ever wondered why? Simple, because Global Warming, by definition, claimed that humanity’s greenhouse gases were the cause of the planet’s warming. Just one problem, the planet stopped warming for 16 years and greenhouse gases increased dramatically, oops? Further, all projections of global warming fell short of doom and gloom climate modeling. Oh no, now what?
Well, there was an interesting article in the New York Times on November 12, 2014 titled; “Wobbling on Climate Change,” in the Op-Ed section by Piers J. Seller
When I read this I thought to myself, “Really?” I mean “What a pathetic article”, I thought. You see yes we need climate science but with such a big complex system why the hell are these scientists denying mathematically proven attributes of chaos theory and trying to convince us that their supercomputer modeling of climate science is accurate Bull that’s it not. Either they know they are lying, or they deny their own props and strong shoulders of dead white men.
Why is everyone so enamored with the brainwashing of the masses, turning CO2 (a trace gas) into a demon of the future of our species? Hell, there’s nothing wrong with carbon, you’re 17% made of it, it’s an element, necessary for life. It’s one of the things we look for when we try to find suitable other planets that might support life. Too funny all these religious dogma-esque attempts to justify stealing from the energy sector, diverting perhaps trillions of dollars into the pockets of the architects of this scheme. Do you want to debate with me? You can’t, because you’ll be using false data, manipulated science, and the best guess of a chaotic system that we already know cycles itself, which it’s been doing for hundreds of millions of years.
May I ask: who said that global warming is bad for life on Earth? In general, warming periods are good for life, as it is the ICE AGES that we should be concerned about.
How much CO2 is the right amount, and who are we to say? CO2 is a trace gas, it’s not something terribly toxic. Sure, too much CO2 causes problems for human breathing, but you really need to increase significantly to get there. Without CO2 there would be no humans on the planet, and without carbon we would certainly look and have evolved differently here on this Pale Blue Dot.
At some point we have to clear up the science and political climate agendas have to go away or we risk doing something really stupid by using groupthink. Please consider all this and think about it.